Innovation Management
- UE code EINGM200
-
Schedule
30Quarter 2
- ECTS Credits 5
-
Language
Français
- Teacher Castiaux Annick
- Capacity to analyse the situation of an organisation and to develop, at a strategic level, a relevant innovation project, including a prospective analysis of its possible impacts ;
- Understanding of the various factors influencing the innovation dynamics ;
- Understanding og the opportunities and limits of collaborations for innovation ;
- Integration of society challenges in innovation (ethical dimension of innovation) ;
- Large vision of methods and tools for innovation management.
The main objectives of the course are
This course analyses the different facettes of the innovation process. It includes five theoretical parts: (1) Innovation Dynamics ; (2) Innovation Strategy ; (3) Open Innovation ; (4) Sustainable Innovation ; (5) Managerial Innovation. Additionnally, methods and tools to manage innovation will be studied, looking at their relevance following the context and innovation type. In particular, we will consider new agile methods that are more and more in use in the digital industry and are spreading in other sector.
The evaluation is based on two parts. The first one (30% of the grade) is a group work performed by maximum 4 students and dedicated to a topic of innovation management (i.e. case study, literature review…). This part will be evaluated by a presentation of this work in one of the course sessions. The second part (70% of the grade) is a written exam evaluating the capacity of the student to master the course contents
Reading 1 : Christensen (1999). “The Innovator’s Dilemma.” Harvard Business School Press.
Reading 2 : Markides & Geroski (2003). “Colonizers and consolidators: The two cultures of Corporate Strategy,” Strategy+Business Issue 3
Reading 3 : Teece and Pisano (1997). “Dynamic Capabilities and Strategic Management”
Reading 4 : Von Hippel (2005). “Democratizing Innovation.” The MIT Press.
Reading 5 : Birkinshaw, Hamel and Mol (2008). “Management innovation,” The Academy of Management Review, Vol. 33(3)