Learning outcomes

Learn to reason, argue and read a text

Content

Logic: A. Propositional logic B. Ancient predicate logic C. Modern predicate logic D. Non-classical logics Argumentation: A. Quasi-logical arguments B. Real-based arguments Arguments based on reality C. Arguments of enhancement D. Psychological arguments REFERENCE BOOKS Thiry Ph., Notions de logique, De Boeck-Université, 1991. Dopp J., Notions de logique formelle, Paris-Nauwelaerts, 1967.

Assessment method

FORMULA: WRITTEN exam in January or June METHOD: WRITTEN exam: 1. 10 questions (5 exercises - 5 theoretical questions) 2. in lecture hall - Duration: maximum 2 h. 30. 3. No documents will be used. CRITERIA: 1. accuracy (or not) of the answer. 2. Accuracy of terms for theoretical questions 3. Quality of presentation (written or oral).

Sources, references and any support material

Recommended readings are in the syllabus.

Language of instruction

Français
Training Study programme Block Credits Mandatory
Bachelor in Law Standard 0 4
Bachelor in Law Standard 2 4