Religious Studies: Anthropology, Metaphysics and Science
- UE code SSPSB102
-
Schedule
30Quarter 2
- ECTS Credits 2
-
Language
Français
- Teacher
Learning outcomes
Religious Studies: Anthropology, Metaphysics and Science
Learn to work in a team
Use coaching to optimize your project
Make decisions that engage people
Discover the importance of metaphysical systems called cosmovisions in the art of being human.
Recognize the critical role that cosmovisions have played in structuring societies and individual lives throughout history and across the planet.
Become aware of the resources of cosmovisions as a heritage of humanity and a reservoir of concepts and stories to fuel mental creativity in the arts and sciences.
Objectives
The common thread running through this teaching is: What is it to be human? How does the human being function as an individual in society? What is his essential quest? What mediations does he use to achieve it? The philosopher Paul Ricoeur argues that the human being is a mediating being. In this sense, the course "Questions de sciences religieuses" is an invitation to discover the human being as an individual and as a species, and how he or she uses cosmovisions - theories of global reality - as a means of self-realization.
Self-fulfillment or self-actualization thus appears as an imperative necessity. According to the philosopher Ernst Cassirer, human beings actualize themselves through mediating elements such as language, art, ritual, and religion.
This teaching is an opportunity to show how these symbolic activities give efficiency to the human world, from access to inner peace to action in the city aimed at making people. Finally, cosmovisions, or theories of global reality, are not only a source of knowledge about human beings; they are also a reservoir of often counterintuitive concepts, alternative logics, and exemplary narratives that can be used to fuel mental creativity, especially in the arts and sciences.
Teaching content
The teaching is approached thematically in order to cross the different areas outlined above. The first theme aims to raise awareness of the uniqueness of modern man. Indeed, in the Eurasian space, other humanities, such as Neanderthals and Denisovans, with whom modern man has cohabited and exchanged genes, are no longer irreducible otherness. Similarly, neither the other humanities of Southeast Asia, such as Flores Man, nor those of East Africa, such as Naledi Man, have survived.
The second theme deals with the notion of cultural evolution and covers the Upper Palaeolithic, Mesolithic and Neolithic periods in the Eurasian region. This period is analyzed through artifacts such as rock art, Mesolithic burials and camps, and Neolithic sites such as Göbekli Tepe and Çatal Hüyük in present-day Anatolia, as well as funerary art from this period in the Levant.
The third theme is a taxonomy of the cosmovisions that have accompanied humanity since its beginnings, as suggested by the artifacts left by Neanderthals in the Bruniquel cave in the Tarn region of France, or the geoglyphs of the Nazca people. A method of study is indicated to analyze their respective complexity and power of mediation. The study shows that cosmovisions are cultural organisms that emerge at a particular moment in history, develop, intersect, diversify, and then either disappear or perpetuate themselves through updating.
The fourth theme deals with cosmovisions as resources for intellectual creativity in the arts and sciences. Within this framework, we analyze, among other things, the potential of Nāgārjuna's writings in logic and theoretical physics, those of Zhu Xi and Wang Yangming of the neo-Confucianist current in theoretical physics, and those of Christianity in logic and mathematics.
The fifth theme analyzes the ways in which cosmovisions intervene in the management of humanity's critical realities, suggesting perspectives, providing solutions, or innovating with respect to the resources available to date. Critical realities include, among others, the chaos that individuals and peoples inevitably introduce into the public sphere, the relationship with others as individuals and as a constituted group, cultural creativity, species consciousness, and the meaning of existence.
Assessment
T
Teaching is assessed in two stages.
The team will be graded on the quality of their work, presentation, and answers to questions. This evaluation is worth 10 points (6 points for the oral presentation and 4 points for the answers to questions).
At the end of each session, a cross-cutting question will be formulated for the workgroup section. This will form the basis of an individual written examination worth 10 points.
Sources, references and any other supporting material
Bellah, Robert N. Religion in Human Evolution: from the Paleolithic to the axial age, The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 2011.
Clayton, Philip; Simson, Zachary (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Religion and Science, Oxford University Press, 2008.
Fuller, Michel; Evers; Dirk; Saether, Knut-Willy. (eds), Issues in Science and Theology: Are We Special? Human Uniqueness in Science and Theology, Springer, 2017.
Nishitani, Keiji, Qu’est-ce que la religion ?, Paris, Cerf, 2017.
Syllabus 2024-2025.
Training | Study programme | Block | Credits | Mandatory |
---|---|---|---|---|
Bachelor in Physics | Standard | 0 | 2 | |
Bachelor in Biology | Standard | 0 | 2 | |
Bachelor in Chemistry | Standard | 0 | 2 | |
Bachelor in Geography : General | Standard | 0 | 2 | |
Bachelor in Mathematics | Standard | 0 | 2 | |
Bachelor in Geology | Standard | 0 | 2 | |
Bachelor in Biology | Standard | 1 | 2 | |
Bachelor in Chemistry | Standard | 1 | 2 | |
Bachelor in Geography : General | Standard | 1 | 2 | |
Bachelor in Mathematics | Standard | 1 | 2 | |
Bachelor in Geology | Standard | 1 | 2 | |
Bachelor in Physics | Standard | 1 | 2 | |
Bachelor in Biology | Standard | 2 | 2 |